Tribunals fire two in APS cheating cases | ajc.com
There's always a reason it isn't really cheating. I didn't know you meant that. I was just clarifying the question. I only told students to recheck their answers. This isn't an unbiased panel. You can't judge me. I did that when I taught second grade: The rules were different. It was just to get them to focus.
The educators being slowly processed through their tribunals are not producing the "smoking gun" testimony I'm looking for. It's an open secret that the SRT directors were telling their principals to raise the test scores by any means necessary or face non-renewal of contracts--a threat passed on to the teachers. It's a mystery to me why this isn't coming out in these hearings.
Can it be that the teachers are still too terrified to name names?
No comments:
Post a Comment